Flipping the focus
  • Blog

blog

This discussion forum is being moderated as an expression of servant leadership in teaching & learning. As a collaborative tool for brainstorming enriching experiences for students, teacher learning groups, and district learning teams, we can inspire and build experiences to help empower each of us to personal leadership in learning. Thank you, in advance, for your contributions and leadership to realizing outcomes for improving student achievement, equity and well-being.

FROM THE ARCHIVES

cognitive science...meet the thinking classroom

2/27/2019

0 Comments

 
Welcome back to Flipping the Focus.

Introduction
In the last post (here), you read an interview, conducted by Flipping the Focus, with Ottawa Educator, Jaime DePippo (@MrsDePippo). The interview was Part 2 of a series that delved into the mindset and actions of an educator who is actively exploring the impact of the Thinking Classroom Framework (see Liljedahl, 2017) on student learning and teaching--in both Mathematics and English (Grades 9 and 10, Applied courses).
Picture
During a recent conversation that I had with a colleague, we reflected upon the following statement from that interview:

"Students are capable, critical thinkers and problems solvers.  If we deprive our students of these opportunities, they will not grow.  Students need to be actively engaged in their learning."

This quote, in turn, lead us to the following wonderings:

1-What does this mean for educators' planning? 
  • Given that adolescents are more likely to respond faster emotionally than rationally, how can we better support their learning? 
  • How can we engage adolescents' understanding that it's difficult for them to 'override automatic responses' because their pre-frontal cortex is still maturing?
2-How does novelty--in the context of the Thinking Classroom--fit into conversations (perhaps, larger ones) about student engagement?

The remainder of this post focuses on these questions--that is, not in an effort to answer them: As pointed out by the last wondering, the goal is our own learning...through conversations about exploring where novelty 'fits' into our teaching practices.

As you continue with the information presented from both cognitive science and the Thinking Classroom, invite a colleague to read, reflect on practice, and discuss next steps with you.
"Cognitive Science...Meet the Thinking Classroom"

Thinking Classrooms
In an earlier post, I listed and defined each of the elements (E) of the Thinking Classroom (here). These elements are clustered into, what Dr. Peter Liljedahl, refers to as gears. In the graphic (right), the 14 elements are colour-coded into their respective gear. Generally, as we evolve our pedagogical practice through the elements, we tend to begin with Gear 1 (G1) and progress by adding subsequent gears over time (G2 to G4).


Cognitive Science
Currently, I am helping support networked/regional professional learning around improving student outcomes in Mathematics through inquiry. The inquiries are being implemented by nine, district school boards in Eastern Ontario. These districts, for many years now, have been contributing to both networked learning and educational research through the Eastern Ontario Staff Development Network (EOSDN).

A complementary resource that educators are studying is David A. Sousa's How the Brain Learns Mathematics.
List of Peter Liljedahl's 14 Thinking Classroom Elements
Geared (4) Elements (14) of The Thinking Classroom
Recently, I've been reading and reflecting upon both brain development and cognitive processes that influence teaching and student learning. Below are some highlights from Chapter 5 (Teaching Mathematics to the Preadolescent Brain) and Chapter 6 (Teaching Mathematics to the Adolescent Brain). 
Highlights on Teaching Mathematics to Preadolescent and Adolescent Brains
Based on some the emerging themes, I couldn't help but to consider how these highlights might 'bump up against' the geared elements of the Thinking Classroom Framework. In relation to the wonderings presented (#1 and #2, above), how might the intersection of both cognitive science and Thinking Classrooms impact educators' planning and interaction with students in the evolution of their classroom practice?

In the section that follows, I will present a draft of results of some coding that I completed between the framework and Chapters 5 & 6. In terms of my own interpretation, I am currently seeing that aspects of both cognitive science (CS) and Thinking Classrooms (TC) play a reciprocal role in student learning. That is to say, a TC pedagogy is more successfully enacted when we attend to preadolescent and adolescent brain development, while student cognition is supported by engaging students with the geared elements of the framework.
 Results: "Cognitive Science (CS)...Meet the Thinking Classroom (TC)"
Thinking Classroom Gear Frequency Results - Preadolescence
Figure 1 - TC Gear Frequency Preadolescent
Thinking Classroom Gear Frequency - Adolescent
Figure 2 - TC Gear Frequency Adolescent
Figures 1 and 2 present the relative frequencies with which each of the gears (i.e., group of elements) related to the highlighted material in Chapters 5 and 6. Most notable are the differences between the relative frequencies of Gears 2 and 3 (see graphic for description of each gear's elements, above). 
Picture
Figure 3 - TC Elements Frequency (Combined Sets)
TC Elements-Adolescent
Figure 3 presents the frequencies for each of the 14 elements and for each stage in cognitive development--preadolescence and adolescence. The adolescent data portrays elements 9 through 11 as supporting adolescent cognition the most (i.e., "Gear 3")--specifically, managing hints and extensions; consolidating from the bottom; and student self-assessment.
Next to these, elements 4, 7 and 12 were also coded frequently--i.e., using verbal instructions, constructing meaningful notes, and communicating where students are in their learning/where they are going, respectively.

TC Elements-Preadolescent
Figure 3 also presents the frequencies for preadolescent learners. Notably, elements 4, 8 and 10 seem to be most influential in supporting preadolescent cognition (i.e., verbal instructions, building autonomy, and consolidating from the bottom, respectively), followed by elements 7, 9 and 12.
Discussion
​
Before wading further into the complexity of these results, I would like to re-emphasize that these are drafted--i.e., they, on the basis of my interpretation, suggest how CS and TC are related. They also provide you with a glimpse into my own reflective practice: not only is this how I inquire, in part, into examining the value of pedagogical practice on student engagement and learning; it is also representative of the collaborative inquiries we can be doing alongside and in support of future-ready learners.

​It's also important to consider those places where I have used the word, "most", in relation to support. For example, when thinking about the most frequently recorded skills for  preadolescents, it's not that learners already 'arrive' with these abilities; rather, we use the elements to actively engage learners and support the development of their executive functioning. Similarly with adolescents, learners may not enter in to your class already expressing the skills encompassed by the emerging themes (table, above). What it does imply is that we can attend to planning and interacting with learners in ways that will bring about growth in these areas. 

"Students are capable, critical thinkers and problems solvers.  If we deprive our
students of these opportunities, they will not grow.  Students need to be
actively engaged in their learning."

In addition to the thinking, above, each student develops and attains proficiency in different ways and at different times. To help students grow their mindset around becoming assessment-capable,  actively build, share and discuss students' learner profiles with them--especially as you plan tiered interventions with your "students of mystery". You can access a sample TC observation and student profiling template here to support your TC planning, documentation and profiling.

With respect to planning instruction for all (Chapter 2; Learning for All, 2013), we might interpret Figure 1 as Gear 2 elements being more widely used to setting the foundation for more complex interactions between preadolescent learners with elements of the "Assessment Loop" (Causarano & Coulombe, 2018)--for example, establishing assessment capability for deepened learning through self-assessment, goal setting and monitoring towards attaining goals. 

Moving towards adolescence, we might look upon the prevalence of Gear 3 elements as leveraging students' growing capacity to solving complex problems for deepening their conceptual understanding. We might also see how assigning fewer, meaningful "check your understanding" problems puts less strain on working memory, provides adequate time for elaborative rehearsal--lending itself also to developing procedural fluency.


Across all graphs (Figures 1 to 3), you'll note an under-representation of gear 1 and 4 elements. Gear 1 elements--good tasks, VNPSs and VRGs: these are the starting point for any educator's journey into enacting a TC pedagogy. Even for educators consistently practising Gear 4 elements, alongside their students, Gear 1 elements are a 'gateway' to engaging in deep, pedagogical practice. Notably, these elements can be implemented quickly and, perhaps, contribute indirectly--through classroom structures (physical space and groupings)--to student cognition. Gears 2 and 3 are comprised of a number of strategies that engage students to being active in their learning. Our engagement with these strategies means that we are consistently monitoring and communicating with learners over time. These actions, we might say, have direct impact on student learning and are more easily referenced against developmental markers from CS. Lastly, most of the Gear 4 elements relate to assessments of learning. These can be redressed by students and teachers in a formative manner but constitute a small amount of all assessments performed.
Conclusion
Beyond what has been presented in this post, there is so much that we can discuss and propose as inquiries that bridge the gap between the many opportunities we have to promote student learning and the actual learning that takes place for educators and their students.

In the opening, two wonderings were shared:

​1-What does this mean for educators' planning? 
  • Given that adolescents are more likely to respond faster emotionally than rationally, how can we better support their learning? 
  • How can we engage adolescents' understanding that it's difficult for them to 'override automatic responses' because their pre-frontal cortex is still maturing?
2-How does novelty--in the context of the Thinking Classroom--fit into conversations (perhaps, larger ones) about student engagement?

As you move forward with your own journey into enacting a TC pedagogy, I believe the following might serve as good guiding statements:
  • The Thinking Classroom can be enacted in such ways to support the development of student cognition.
  • The Thinking Classroom supports what is currently known about cognitive science and brain maturation.
  • When students understand how they learn and why a particular pedagogy is being used, they will be more likely to see themselves as confident and assessment-capable learners.
How Might I Share This Synthesis in My Context?
 
If the ideas presented in this post is something that you'd like to share within your own context (e.g., PLC, district team, learning network), I have posted a consolidation of the blog in the form of a slide-deck for your use. If you do happen to use it, please extend an invitation to me to discuss your plans.

You can view the slide-deck below, as well as downloading your own copy that includes notes I've used in speaking about the material in this blog, as well as future, potential directions for collaborative and action-based research.

Prefer to listen to a presentation of the synthesis? View the slides in the form of video? See the button below to listen/view.
MAKE A COPY
VIEW/LISTEN
Final Remarks
In closing, I can't help but to think of the conversations that can be inspired when we take collective action to improving student learning. As this blog is a means for readers to network and gradually change the context for how they teach and learn, we all benefit by drawing nearer to the perspectives shared here and shared beyond with our professional learning networks. Please feel free to share your comments and questions to this post using the "Leave a Reply" form provided, below.
​
I am more than happy to collaborate with you and make our learning visible, here, in this blog and across Flipping the Focus' social media platforms, as well as your own. I
f at any time, you have questions or comments, please feel free to reach out to me at Flipping the Focus. 

Sincerely,

Chris Stewart, OCT
Education Leader at Flipping the Focus
CONTACT CHRIS
BOOK CHRIS

References
Causarano, J., & Coulombe, H. (2018, September 14). The Assessment Loop: Merging Assessment and Instruction. Retrieved January 29, 2019, from https://harnessassessment.com/2018/09/04/the-assessment-loop-merging-assessment-and-instruction/
​
EduGAINS. (2013). Learning for All, A Guide to Effective Assessment and Instruction for All Students, Kindergarten to Grade 12. Retrieved from http://www.edugains.ca/newsite/Learning4All/whats_L4All.html

Liljedahl, P. (2017, October 17). Building a Thinking Classroom in Math. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/article/building-thinking-classroom-math
​

Margaret Sinclair Memorial Award Lecture: Peter Liljedahl. (2019, February 14). Retrieved from http://www.fields.utoronto.ca/activities/18-19/Margaret-Sinclair-lecture 
​
Sousa, D. A. (2008). How The Brain Learns Mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Thinking Classrooms: An Interview with Jaime DePippo - Part 2 [Online Interview]. (2019, February 18).

​
0 Comments
    Tweet

    RSS Feed

    Picture
    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Author

    I am passionate about leadership for learning and teaching and learning through inquiry. Through collaborative exploration of high-yield, pedagogical strategies, I have been able to further engage students to deepen their learning and fellow educators in continuously growing their practice--Flipped Learning, Thinking Classrooms, and culturing Student Voice as examples.  I hope that this site serves you well in your educational journey through teaching and learning by moving professional learning into your time ... your space. If you have questions or feedback, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Chris Stewart (OCT).

    Archives

    November 2019
    July 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    August 2017
    June 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    August 2016
    February 2016
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013

    NEW SITE!
    Check out: Flipped PL
    Tweets by @math_inquirer

    Categories

    All
    21c
    3-Act Math Tasks
    3-math Acts
    5 Practices
    6Cs
    Aaron Sams
    Accountable Talk
    Achieving Excellence
    Action Plan
    AEAC
    AJ Juliani
    Alex Overwijk
    Andy Hargreaves
    Assessment As Learning
    Assessment-capable
    Assessment For Learning
    Assessment Loop
    Assessment Of Learning
    Autonomy
    Balanced Instruction
    Bandura
    Basic Skills
    #belong
    Belonging
    BIPsa
    #blendedlearning
    Carol Dweck
    Cathy Bruce
    Chris Stewart
    Christine Suurtamm
    Classroom Discourse
    Classroom Video
    Coaching
    Cognitive Science
    Coherence
    Co Learner
    Co-learner
    Collaboration
    Collaborative Inquiry
    Collaborative Professionalism
    Collective Capacity
    Collective Efficacy
    Colonialism
    Communication
    Conceptual
    Continuing Education
    Conversations
    Co-planning
    Coteaching
    Co-teaching
    Critical Frienc
    Crystal Kirch
    Culturally-responsive Pedagogy
    Cycle Of Inquiry
    Danielle LaPointe-McEwan
    Dan Meyer
    Data-Driven
    David A. Sousa
    David Thomas
    Deeper Learning
    Deep Learning
    Delia Bush
    Descriptive Feedback
    Differentiation
    Digital Footprint
    Digital Leadership
    Digital Portfolio
    #diglead
    Diigo
    DJ Cunningham
    Documentation
    Don Klinger
    Dynamic Learning
    Edadmin
    EDpuzzle
    Education
    Educational Leadership
    Effect Size
    Efficacy
    Elementary
    Emergent Leadership
    EOSDN
    EQAO
    Equity
    Equity Hypothesis
    Executive Functioning
    Feedback
    Flipclass
    #flipclass
    Flipped Classroom
    Flipped Learning
    Flipped Learning Network
    Flipped Pd
    Flipped PL
    Flipped PLN Finder
    Flipping The Focus
    Flow
    Formative Assessment
    Gap Closing
    George Couros
    Global Competencies
    Golden Circle
    GoodNotes
    Google Doc
    Google Forms
    Gratefulness
    Growing Success
    Growth Mindset
    Guest Blog
    Guest-blog
    Guest Blogger
    Guided Inquiry
    @HarnessingA
    Hattie
    Helene Coulombe
    History Of Math
    How Do You Know?
    If-then
    Inclusion
    Inclusive Environments
    Indigenous
    Indigenous Education
    Indigenous Learning Model
    Innovation
    Inquiry
    Insights
    Instructional Core
    Instructional Leadership
    Jaime Depippo
    Jimmy Pai
    Joanie Causarano
    Jo Boaler
    John Hattie
    Jon Bergmann
    Jon Orr
    Junior Math Study
    K-12 IPAT
    Kemptville
    Kemptville Public School
    Ken Leithwood
    Knowing Your Learners
    Kristin Daniels
    Kyle Pearce
    #L2BB4L
    Land Acknowledgement
    Land Treaties
    Leadership
    Learner Profiles
    Learning Cafe-UCDSB
    Learning For All
    Learning Goals
    Learning Partner
    Learning Preferences
    Learning Skills
    Learning Styles
    LearnStyle
    Lesson Study
    Lisa Ain Dack
    Listening
    Long-term Memory
    Lucy West
    Lyn Sharatt
    Macpl 2019
    Marian Small
    Mary Jean Gallagher
    Mastery Learning
    Math Community
    Math Talk
    Meaningful Notes
    Metacognition
    MFM1P
    Michael Fullan
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Forms
    Mindset
    Ministry Of Education
    Monitoring School Improvement
    Monitoring Student Learning
    #MTBoS
    Narrative Feedback
    North Grenville DHS
    Number Strings
    OAME
    OCSB
    Ocsbmath
    OCT
    Office 365
    Onenote
    Ontario
    Ontario's Equity Action Plan
    Parent Engagement
    Parents
    Paul Tough
    PBL
    Pedagogical Documentation
    Pedagogical Learning
    Pedagogical Practice
    Pedagogical System
    Peer-assessment
    Perceptual Data
    Peter Liljedahl
    Phil Dawes
    PjBL
    Place-Based Learning
    Plan-Act-Assess-Reflect
    PLC
    PLN
    Portfolio
    Principal
    Principal As Co-learner
    Problem Of Practice
    Problem Solving
    Procedural
    Process Skills
    Professional Development
    Professional Learning
    Professional Learning Community
    Professionally Speaking
    Project-based Learning
    Queen's University
    Reconciliation
    Reflection
    Reflective Practitioner
    Relational Trust
    Relationships
    Renewed Math Strategy
    Representations
    Residential Schooling
    Resilience
    Responsive Pedagogy
    RMS
    Rola Tibshirani
    Rotman IThink
    Sandra Herbst
    Sandy Pignon
    School Administration
    School Effectiveness Framework
    School Improvement
    School Learning Team
    School Level Leadership
    School-level Leadership
    SE2R
    Self Assessment
    Self-assessment
    Self-confidence
    Seth Godin
    Seven Fallen Feathers
    SIM K 12
    SIM K-12
    Simon Breakspear
    Simon Sinek
    SIPsa
    #sitbeside
    Small School Summit
    Spiraling
    Stanford
    Stephen Hurley
    Steven Katz
    Storify
    Story-Telling
    Student Achievement
    Student Centered
    Student-centered
    Student-centred
    Student Engaged Assessment
    Student-engaged Assessment
    Student Engagement
    Student Improvement Plan
    Students As Researchers
    Students Of Mystery
    Student Survey
    #studentvoice
    Student Voice
    Student Wellbeing
    Student Well-being
    Success Criteria
    Susan Dion
    Susan Scott
    Talk Moves
    Tap Into Teen Minds
    Teacher Efficacy
    Teacher Observation Tool
    Teaching
    TED Talk
    Thinking Classroom
    Third Teacher
    Thought Partner
    Tom Driscoll
    Tools & Resources
    Transferable Skills
    Tribes
    Truth
    UBC
    UCDSB
    #ucdsb
    #ucdsbmath
    University Of Windsor
    Upper Canada DSB
    Values Causal Model
    Values-Causal Model
    Vertical Spaces
    Video Instruction
    Visible Learning
    Visible Thinking
    Vision Of The Mathematics Learner
    Viviane Robinson
    VNPS
    #vnps
    VoicEd Radio
    VRG
    Whiteboards
    Why
    Will Richardson
    Working Memory


    Disclaimer
    ​The discussion, information, and materials provided in this online space do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Upper Canada District School Board (UCDSB), Ontario Association of Mathematics Educators (OAME), Ontario Ministry of Education (MoE), the University of Windsor (Faculty of Education), and their affiliates. This online space is intended to provide its readers and/or contributors with opportunities to learn about and share, respectively, information about teaching & learning. The UCDSB, OAME, MoE, UWindsor, and their affiliates do not guarantee the accuracy and appropriateness of the content posted. Aside from the moderators' posts, Flipping the Focus does not guarantee the accuracy of the comments and/or information posted by contributors. The moderators have the right to remove and will remove any content that they deem inappropriate or offensive. Questions regarding the information posted can be directed to the site's moderators using the contact form provided (below).

      Contact

    Submit
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photos used under Creative Commons from g23armstrong, Sebastian Mary, LizMarie_AK, Frontierofficial, US Department of Education, gordontarpley, juanpol